Agent systems for
clinical development
operations.

Put agents to work across clinical data management, clinical operations, and quality assurance. One shared data foundation, with source evidence, quality checks, and human review built in.

Book a workflow demoExplore the platform

The Panoptive foundation

One clinical foundation.
Many operational workflows.

Study data, documents, and operational history live across teams and systems. Panoptive connects that context so agents can carry out the work.

Shared evidence, versioned workflows, and configured review controls support each system—from an incoming data delivery to a quality finding.

Illustrative system view

Built into every system

  • Source evidence
  • Versioned workflows
  • Human review

Agentic systems, in practice

Put the foundation
to work.

Start with the work your team needs to move forward. Our systems share the study context, with quality checks and review built into execution.

External data operations

Move vendor deliveries from specification to reviewed study data. Agents support mapping, quality checks, and reconciliation, with exceptions connected to their source for your team to resolve.

Explore external data operations
PK-015 · Reconciliation resultCollection timepoint differs
Needs review
Vendor delivery2 hReported collection timepointResults!D18
Study registry4 hExpected collection timepointSamples!F44
One sample. Two source values.

Review the discrepancy before this delivery is released.

Illustrative detail · Synthetic data

Trial monitoring oversight

Turn monitoring reports and study data into connected issues, documented sponsor decisions, and clear follow-up. Keep the evidence and the work that follows in one case history.

Explore trial monitoring oversight
Study 204 · Site 012Sponsor decision & follow-through
DispositionFor sponsor review
Request supporting evidence

Confirm who verified the training action and retain the acknowledgement record.

Proposed actionObtain the verified acknowledgement
OwnerClinical operations
Closure evidence

No verification record attached

Pending
Illustrative detail · Synthetic data

QA automation

Compare study records with protocols and SOPs. Agents assess the available evidence, make gaps explicit, and prepare findings and remediation for your quality team to review.

Explore QA automation
Study 204 · Supplied study recordsEvidence assessment
Record assessmentEvidence
Action statusThe action is recorded as complete
Full
Verification recordSupporting record is not supplied
Missing
Closure verificationSOP-QA-04 · §5.3
Partial

Reviewer, review date, and supporting evidence are not established by the supplied record.

Illustrative detail · Synthetic data

For the teams running clinical development

Make AI part of
how your team works.

Pharma & biotech

Connect external data, monitoring evidence, and quality review while keeping sponsor decisions and follow-through visible.

Explore sponsor workflows

CRO teams

Resolve data exceptions, prepare traceable deliverables, and bring operational evidence into sponsor reviews.

Explore data operations

Quality, control & security

Built to act.
Designed to stay in control.

Give agents the context to do useful work, with clear boundaries around access, execution, and release. Your team can inspect the evidence and review consequential decisions.

SOC 2 audit in progress

Explore securityVisit Trust Center

AI-provider data controls

Zero data retention (ZDR) and an executed Business Associate Agreement (BAA).

Scoped access

Workspace roles, study-scoped access, and revocable integration credentials define access.

Traceable execution

Versioned workflows and source-linked outputs preserve the record behind the work.

Review and release controls

Configured gates keep unresolved blockers visible and consequential decisions governed.

Getting started

A clear starting point
for your team.

What can we automate today?

Our existing systems support external data mapping, checks and reconciliation; monitoring issue review and follow-up; and QA evidence assessment with draft findings and remediation. Each builds on Panoptive’s shared clinical data foundation.

How does Panoptive fit with our existing systems?

Panoptive works with study data and records from your existing systems. We scope supported sources, formats, and integration requirements around the workflow being evaluated, so your team has a clear starting point.

Who controls decisions and release?

Agents execute configured work, surface exceptions, and prepare proposed actions. Review and release gates keep consequential decisions with your team, with the supporting source evidence available for inspection.

Can we start with one workflow?

Yes. Start with a defined workflow in external data operations, trial monitoring oversight, or QA. Together, we establish representative inputs, required outputs, reviewers, and success criteria before considering additional workflows.

How is clinical data handled?

Panoptive combines scoped access with traceable execution and controlled review. Our AI-provider arrangements include zero data retention and an executed BAA. Our SOC 2 audit is in progress.

Read about security

Start with one workflow.
Build from there.

Walk through a relevant example and discuss the sources, review requirements, and scope of a focused pilot.

Book a workflow demo